McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is one of our most iconic Supreme Court precedents. According to James Bradley Thayer – “The chief illustration [of Marshall’s] “giving free scope to the power of the national government.” Marshall’s signature nation building achievement, seemingly an “infinite increase in the powers of the federal government.” “Marshall’s capacious understandings of the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Commerce Clause were sufficient to accommodate the modern regulatory state.” Where federal and state governing actions collide, the national prerogatives are supreme. In the case of a national bank, federal supremacy holds that federal operations are immune from state taxation. The federal government, “though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action.” Supports broad constructions of Congress’ Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause powers. Federalism reflects the dynamic distribution of power between national and state government. When distributing power between national, state and local governments McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) made one thing perfectly clear, the power given to the national government is supreme.
Question 1
Short answer
What is the main argument presented in the excerpt?
Question 2
Short answer
How does the excerpt interpret the powers of the Congress and the States?
Question 3
Short answer
What is the Court's opinion on the law passed by the Legislature of Maryland? Why?
Question 4
Short answer
What does the excerpt say about the taxation powers of the States?
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.
Other U.S. Government & Politics Assignments
10.1 FRQ10.2 FRQ10.3 FRQ11.1 FRQ11.2 FRQ11.3 FRQ12/12 - Campaign Finance12.1 FRQ12.2 FRQ12.3 FRQ12.4 FRQ1.2 FRQ13.1 FRQ13.2 FRQ13.3 FRQ13.4 FRQ13.5 FRQ1.3 FRQ14.1 FRQ14.2 FRQ14.3 FRQ14.4 FRQ1.4 Challenges of the Articles of Confederation | Shays' Rebellion1.4 FRQ14th Amendment FRQ15.1 FRQ15.2 FRQ15.3 FRQ16.1 FRQ16.2 FRQ16.3 FRQ1st Amendment and Supreme Court Decisions2.15 Policy and Branches of Government 2.1 FRQ(2.2) Comprehensive FRQ: People's Pie - Budget Process 2.2 FRQ2.2 FRQ(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr (1962) and Bush v. Gore (2000)(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr & Shaw v. Reno(2.9) Federalist No. 783.1.8 Aspire to Do: FRQ #43.2 FRQ3.4 FRQ3rd Party Barriers4.1 American Attitudes About Government and Politics4.1 FRQ4.2 FRQ4.3 FRQ4.4 FRQ4.5 Concept Application