(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr (1962) and Bush v. Gore (2000)
(2.3) Baker v. Carr (1962) and Bush v. Gore (2000) The 2000 U.S. presidential election hinged on contested results in Florida, where irregularity in ballot counting led to a statewide recount. Different counties used varying methods to recount the ballots, raising concerns about fairness and consistency. The Bush campaign filed a lawsuit, claiming the lack of uniform standards for recounting violated constitutional principles. In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court halted the recount, determining that the inconsistent counting methods could not ensure a fair election outcome.
Question 1
Short answer
Identify the common constitutional principle in both Baker v. Carr and Bush v. Gore.
Question 2
Short answer
Explain how the facts in Baker v. Carr and Bush v. Gore led to the Court's ruling in both cases.
Question 3
Short answer
Describe one way the federal government could standardize election procedures following the decision in Bush v. Gore to ensure fairness in future elections.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.
Other U.S. Government & Politics Assignments
10.1 FRQ10.2 FRQ10.3 FRQ11.1 FRQ11.2 FRQ11.3 FRQ12/12 - Campaign Finance12.1 FRQ12.2 FRQ12.3 FRQ12.4 FRQ1.2 FRQ13.1 FRQ13.2 FRQ13.3 FRQ13.4 FRQ13.5 FRQ1.3 FRQ14.1 FRQ14.2 FRQ14.3 FRQ14.4 FRQ1.4 Challenges of the Articles of Confederation | Shays' Rebellion1.4 FRQ14th Amendment FRQ15.1 FRQ15.2 FRQ15.3 FRQ16.1 FRQ16.2 FRQ16.3 FRQ1st Amendment and Supreme Court Decisions2.15 Policy and Branches of Government 2.1 FRQ(2.2) Comprehensive FRQ: People's Pie - Budget Process 2.2 FRQ2.2 FRQ(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr & Shaw v. Reno(2.9) Federalist No. 783.1.8 Aspire to Do: FRQ #43.2 FRQ3.4 FRQ3rd Party Barriers4.1 American Attitudes About Government and Politics4.1 FRQ4.2 FRQ4.3 FRQ4.4 FRQ4.5 Concept Application