AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: Concept Application: Federalism and Drinking Age

After reading the scenario, please respond to the questions. 
The adoption of the 26th Amendment in 1971 did more than lower the voting age to 18. One unintended consequence of the Amendment was that many state legislatures passed laws lowering the drinking age to 18. They reasoned that if someone could vote, they should also be allowed to drink alcohol. 

Drunk driving accidents increased significantly over the next few years, causing groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving to petition the federal government for a national drinking age law. However, such a law would violate the 21st Amendment’s statute that the states and not the federal government regulated alcohol sales.

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 told states they would lose 10% of their federal highway funding unless they raised their drinking age to 21. Although some states protested by filing lawsuits, the Supreme Court upheld the law in South Dakota v. Dole (1987).  

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the conflict between state governments and federal governments described in the scenario. 

Question 2

Short answer
Explain one way how cooperative federalism influenced the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984.  

Question 3

Short answer
Compare one way this scenario is similar to or different from the federal government-state government conflict over the legalization of marijuana. 

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.