AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: SCOTUS Comparison: Constitutionality, Censorship, and Prior Restraint: New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)

These questions require you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. 
Founded in 1927, The Saturday Press published anti-Semitic and anti-Black content from its newsroom in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Publisher Jay M. Near claimed that Jewish Americans controlled the city’s politics. Attorney Floyd B. Olson sued the newspaper, claiming it violated the state’s Public Nuisance Law of 1925.

The first trial resulted in a judgement against The Saturday Press. The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling, citing that Near and his newspaper had been granted due process under the law. Appeals brought the case to the Supreme Court, where it became known as Near. V. Minnesota (1931).

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts’ decisions and proclaimed Minnesota’s Public Nuisance Law of 1925 unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court upheld the practice of government censorship of the press in extreme circumstances.
Near v. Minnesota (1931)

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the constitutional provision that is common to Near v. Minnesota (1931) and New York Times Co. v. United States (1971).

Question 2

Short answer
Explain how the reasoning in Near and New York Times led to similar holdings in both cases.

Question 3

Short answer
Explain one circumstance wherein the federal government can use prior restraint. 

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.