AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: SCOTUS Comparison: Constitutional Provisions and Prayer in Schools: Engel v. Vitale (1962)

These questions require you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. 
From 1978-82, Alabama passed three laws promoting prayer in public schools: allowing a “moment of silence,” allowing voluntary prayer sessions, and letting teachers lead prayer with “willing students.” Mobile, Alabama, resident Ishmael Jaffree was against these laws, as his elementary-aged children were teased for not praying with their peers. 

Jaffree sued the Mobile County School Board in 1982. The United States District Court sided with the school board. Federal Appeals Court struck down two of the Alabama laws, whereupon the state appealed the case to the Supreme Court as Wallace v. Jaffree (1985).

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that although holding a moment of silence in public schools was constitutional, open prayer and teachers’ participation in it were unconstitutional. 
Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the constitutional provision that is common to Wallace v. Jaffree (1985) and Engel v. Vitale (1962).

Question 2

Short answer
Explain how the reasoning in Wallace and Engel led to similar holdings in both cases.

Question 3

Short answer
Explain one reason why holding a moment of silence in public schools does not violate the Constitution. 

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.