FRQ #1: Concept Analysis (AP Exam Review)
In May 2017 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced a proposal to repeal net neutrality rules that govern how Internet service providers treat Internet traffic. Under net neutrality rules, companies that sell Internet services to customers must provide access to all Web sites at the same speed. Without net neutrality, Internet service companies can charge consumers or Web sites a premium for high-speed access to certain sites. As required by statute, the FCC opened up the proposed rule for public comment. The rule received an astonishing 21 million comments. However, a study of the comments by Pew Research showed that only 6% of the comments were unique, suggesting that the comments were part of organized campaigns and possibly generated by computer bots. For example, on nine different occasions, more than 75,000 comments were submitted within the same second. Many of the commenter names and e-mail addresses also appeared to be fake.
Question 1
Short answer
Referencing the scenario, describe the function being carried out by the FCC.
Question 2
Short answer
Explain how interest groups can affect the process described in part A.
Question 3
Short answer
In December of 2017, the FCC created the rule ending net neutrality. Explain how Congress could respond to the decision made by the FCC if it opposes the new rule.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.
Other U.S. Government & Politics Assignments
10.1 FRQ10.2 FRQ10.3 FRQ11.1 FRQ11.2 FRQ11.3 FRQ12/12 - Campaign Finance12.1 FRQ12.2 FRQ12.3 FRQ12.4 FRQ1.2 FRQ13.1 FRQ13.2 FRQ13.3 FRQ13.4 FRQ13.5 FRQ1.3 FRQ14.1 FRQ14.2 FRQ14.3 FRQ14.4 FRQ1.4 Challenges of the Articles of Confederation | Shays' Rebellion1.4 FRQ14th Amendment FRQ15.1 FRQ15.2 FRQ15.3 FRQ16.1 FRQ16.2 FRQ16.3 FRQ1st Amendment and Supreme Court Decisions2.15 Policy and Branches of Government 2.1 FRQ(2.2) Comprehensive FRQ: People's Pie - Budget Process 2.2 FRQ2.2 FRQ(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr (1962) and Bush v. Gore (2000)(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr & Shaw v. Reno(2.9) Federalist No. 783.1.8 Aspire to Do: FRQ #43.2 FRQ3.4 FRQ3rd Party Barriers4.1 American Attitudes About Government and Politics4.1 FRQ4.2 FRQ4.3 FRQ4.4 FRQ4.5 Concept Application