AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: SCOTUS Comparison: Gun Control Cases and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)

These questions require you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. 
In 2002, political activist Robert A. Levy set out to challenge the District of Columbia’s laws limiting gun ownership. These laws forbid the possession of handguns and required owners of shotguns and rifles to dissemble these weapons when not in use and install trigger locks.

Levy found six plaintiffs to use the District of Columbia on behalf of his cause. Each plaintiff had a unique life experience that promoted the idea that handguns were necessary for self-defense. One of the plaintiffs was Dick Anthony Heller, a police officer in the District of Columbia. 

The lawsuit began in district court in 2003. The local district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dismissed the lawsuit. The case went in front of the Supreme Court as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).  

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court overturned the District of Columbia’s gun control laws and incorporated the Second Amendment to the district. 
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the civil liberty that is common to both District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). 

Question 2

Short answer
Explain how the reasoning in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago led to a similar holding in both cases.

Question 3

Short answer
Explain how those unhappy with the outcome of either case could a constitutional process to have it overturned.

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.