AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: SCOTUS Comparison: Free Speech and Imminent Action: Schenck v. United States (1919)

These questions require you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. 
Clarence Brandenburg was an Ohio resident and a member of the Ku Klux Klan. In 1964, he invited a local television station to film a Klan rally. The ensuing video featured hate-filled speeches against minority groups and the burning of crosses. The video led to Brandenburg’s arrest under the charge of advocating violence. A court sentenced him to 1-10 years in prison and charged him a $1,000 fine. 

State courts dismissed Brandenburg’s lawsuit to have his conviction overturned. Further appeals brought the case in front of the Supreme Court, where it became known as Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). 

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that Ohio had violated Brandenburg’s First Amendment rights. Also, states could only restrict speech that advocated for “imminent lawless action.”  
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the civil liberty that is common to both Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) and Schenck v. United States (1919).

Question 2

Short answer
Explain how the reasoning in Brandenburg v. Ohio and Schenck v. United States led to different holdings in both cases.

Question 3

Short answer
Explain how the decision in Brandenburg affects states' ability to prevent crime.

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.