AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: Concept Application: First Amendment and Selective Incorporation in Cantwell v. Connecticut.

After reading the scenario, please respond to the questions. 
In the 1930s, Connecticut passed a consumer protection law stating that door-to-door solicitors had to obtain a state-issued certificate. Connecticut resident Newton Cantwell was a Jehovah’s Witness who promoted his faith by knocking on doors in his New Haven neighborhood. Authorities arrested Cantwell and his two sons for playing a phonograph record with a message criticizing the Catholic Church.  

Connecticut charged Cantwell and his sons with violating the state’s consumer protection law and disturbing the peace. The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled against Cantwell, and after appeal, the case went to the Supreme Court as Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940).

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protected Cantwell’s actions. The decision also struck down state laws similar to the Connecticut one. 

Question 1

Short answer
Identify one part of the First Amendment relevant to the arguments in Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940).

Question 2

Short answer
Explain one way that the decision in Cantwell is an example of selective incorporation.

Question 3

Short answer
Explain one example of how selective incorporation of the First Amendment leaves state and federal governments some power to restrict religious activities. 

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.