Subjects /U.S. Government & Politics /Assignments /

SCA: DOMA and the Windsor Case

After reading the scenario, please respond to A, B, and C below.
In 1996, the Republican-controlled Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton. This legislation defined in federal law a “marriage” as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife,” and defined the word “spouse” to mean only “a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”

When Thea Spyer died in 2009, she left her estate to her wife, Edith Windsor. The couple married in Canada in 2007, and were recognized as legally married by the state of New York. However, since the two were not considered legally married for federal tax purposes due to DOMA, Edith Windsor was forced to pay a significant federal estate tax, which would not have applied to an opposite-sex married couple.

Edith Windsor filed suit in a federal court, and the case ultimately reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013. The Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. Windsor (2013).

Question 1

Short answer
Referencing the scenario, describe the judicial power exercised by the court in the United States v. Windsor case and explain why this power gives the Supreme Court the authority to take the action described.

Question 2

Short answer
Explain how states could act to affect the impact of the Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor.

Question 3

Short answer
Describe the constitutional clause in the Fifth Amendment that relates to the United States v. Windsor case, and explain how the decision in the Windsor case could affect future cases.

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other U.S. Government & Politics Assignments

10.1 FRQ10.2 FRQ10.3 FRQ11.1 FRQ11.2 FRQ11.3 FRQ12/12 - Campaign Finance12.1 FRQ12.2 FRQ12.3 FRQ12.4 FRQ1.2 FRQ13.1 FRQ13.2 FRQ13.3 FRQ13.4 FRQ13.5 FRQ1.3 FRQ14.1 FRQ14.2 FRQ14.3 FRQ14.4 FRQ1.4 Challenges of the Articles of Confederation | Shays' Rebellion1.4 FRQ14th Amendment FRQ15.1 FRQ15.2 FRQ15.3 FRQ16.1 FRQ16.2 FRQ16.3 FRQ1st Amendment and Supreme Court Decisions2.15 Policy and Branches of Government 2.1 FRQ(2.2) Comprehensive FRQ: People's Pie - Budget Process 2.2 FRQ2.2 FRQ(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr (1962) and Bush v. Gore (2000)(2.3) SCOTUS FRQ: Baker v. Carr & Shaw v. Reno(2.9) Federalist No. 783.1.8 Aspire to Do: FRQ #43.2 FRQ3.4 FRQ3rd Party Barriers4.1 American Attitudes About Government and Politics4.1 FRQ4.2 FRQ4.3 FRQ4.4 FRQ4.5 Concept Application