AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: SCOTUS Comparison: Segregation, Responsibility & Judicial Restraint: Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

These questions require you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. 
The overturning of racial segregation laws in the 1950s was a major victory for the Civil Rights Movement. However, many African Americans still lived in segregated school districts with underfunded public schools. Nowhere was this more apparent than in Detroit, where, since the Second World War, white residents had moved to the city suburbs in a process known as ‘white flight.’ 

In 1970, the NAACP sued Michigan’s Governor William Milliken, arguing that even though Detroit school districts did not pass laws promoting segregation, they were still responsible for remedying it through integration. The case made its way to the Supreme Court and became known as Milliken v. Bradley (1974).

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that school districts are not responsible for segregation unless their policies were responsible for it. The ruling was a blow to the school integration movement. 
Milliken v. Bradley (1974)

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the constitutional provision that is common to Milliken v. Bradley (1973) and Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

Question 2

Short answer
Explain one way the presence of de facto rather than de jure segregation influenced the Supreme Court's decision in Milliken. 

Question 3

Short answer
Explain one way how the decision in Milliken is an example of judicial restraint. 

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.