AP Success - AP U.S. Gov & Pol: SCOTUS Comparison: Constitutional Provision and Student Drug Testing: Roe v. Wade (1973)

These questions require you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. 
In the early 2000s, the Tecumseh, Oklahoma, School District began requiring middle and high school students to take drug tests if they wished to join an extracurricular activity. Parents of two students filed a lawsuit against the district. 

A Federal District Court and Court of Appeals sided with the parents, as the school district could not prove that drug tests were necessary. The school district appealed these decisions to the Supreme Court, where it the case became known as Board of Education v. Earls (2002)

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Tecumseh, Oklahoma, School District’s drug testing program did not violate students’ constitutional rights. The Court also ruled that public school districts had an interest in stopping student drug use. 
Board of Education v. Earls (2002)

Question 1

Short answer
Identify the constitutional provision that is common to Board of Education v. Earls (2002) and Roe v. Wade (1973).

Question 2

Short answer
Explain how the reasoning in Board of Education and Roe led to different holdings in both cases.

Question 3

Short answer
Explain one political action that members of the public against the holding in Board of Education could take to overturn mandatory drug testing.  

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.