Framing the Constitution Conceptual FRQ
In his essay “Framing the Constitution,” historian Charles A. Beard described the Constitutional Convention as follows: It was a truly remarkable assembly of men that gathered in Philadelphia on May 17, 1787, to undertake the work of reconstructing the American system of government. . . . The makers of the Constitution represented the solid, conservative, commercial and financial interests of the country. . . . [T]he members of that assembly were not seeking to realize any fine notions about democracy and equality, but were striving with all the resources of political wisdom at their command to set up a system of government that would be stable and efficient, safeguarded on the one hand against the possibilities of despotism and on the other against the onslaught of majorities. . . . Madison doubtless summed up in a brief sentence the general opinion of the convention when he said that to secure private rights against minority factions, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and form of popular government, was the great object to which their inquiries had been directed. They were anxious above everything else to safeguard the rights of private property against any leveling tendencies on the part of the propertyless masses. Use the quote and your knowledge of U.S. Government and Politics to respond to parts A, B, and C.
Question 1
Short answer
Describe the author's opinion of the founding fathers' goal in drafting the Constitution.
Question 2
Short answer
Identify one constitutional provision that could be used to support the author's opinion, and explain how it could be used to support the author's opinion.
Question 3
Short answer
Identify one constitutional provision that could be used to refute the author's opinion, and explain how it could be used to refute the author's opinion.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.
Other Civics Assignments
5.2 FRQ: Voter Turnout InfluencesAdam Smith, Wealth of Nationsai essay check nibbaAnalysis of a Supreme Court CaseAnalyze the Influence of a Political Philosopher on the Development of American GovernmentAP Gov - Quantitative Analysis FRQ - Education Funding - HandwrittenAP Gov - SCOTUS FRQ - McCulloch v MarylandArgumentative Paragraph on EconomicsBalance of PowerBill of Rights EssayCauses of World War IC.E.R.CC.E. Presidential PowerCitizenship in Athens and Rome DBQ EssayCivics and Community: Understanding Home Renovation RegulationsComparative and Absolute Advantage in ProductionConstitutional AmendmentsDemocratic Principles and the Transatlantic Slave TradeFeb. Current Events AssignmentFishbowl Reflection QuestionsFoundations of NationalismGerrymandering Cartoon AnalysisGov Test #2, 3.1.24Gov Test #3, 4/22/24Hats of the President ReflectionLearner's Permit Regulations and Public SafetyMid term review open response questionsPeople's PiePeter Carlo PacconePolitical Party IdeologyPowers of the President Inquiry Based QuestionProblem 4-1 - Methods for Resolving DisputesProblem 4.2 - Dispute at the MallReconstruction Amendments in Modern AmericaSCOTUS Comparison FRQ: Brown v. BoardSupporting Question #4: How can the Constitution be changed?Supreme Court Showdown: Landmark CasesThe Evolution of Political PartiesThe President's Daily ScheduleUnderstanding Article I of the U.S. ConstitutionUnderstanding Civic Engagement in Democratic SocietiesUnderstanding Domestic Policy Issues: An 'I Side With' ExplorationUnderstanding the Functions and Influences of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Media in DemocracyUnderstanding the Impeachment ProcessVoting and ElectionsWhat is the difference between and expressed and implied power of Congress?Wisconsin Primary DebateWriting Assessment -- Gideon v. Wainwright