Analysis of Germany’s Offer to Soviet Union for “Political Cooperation” (August 1939)
Read the provided background and excerpts from the telegram sent by Germany’s Foreign Minister Joachim Ribbentrop to the Soviet Union on 14 August 1939. Answer the following questions using evidence from the text. Use complete sentences where appropriate. Some questions require you to select the best answer from a list of options.
BACKGROUND: Below is a telegram that Germany’s Foreign Minister (FM) Joachim Ribbentrop wrote to the Soviet Union on 14 August 1939. It acknowledges the existing hostility between Germany and the Soviet Union. The telegram also states why the countries are at odds with each other. However, it also lays out a plan for how the two can begin cooperating. Ultimately the Soviet government accepts this proposal and the countries soon sign a non-aggression pact. Less than a month later, Germany invades Poland, which starts World War II. However, the pact fell apart in June 1941 when Germany invaded the Soviet Union.
DIRECTIONS: Answer the following questions using evidence from the text. Use complete sentences. Some questions require you to select the best answer from a list of options. Use the feedback from AI bot Ditto to improve your answers. Keep revising your answers until you get 100% from Ditto.
Group 1
Source 1.1
- The ideological contradictions between National Socialist Germany and the Soviet Union were in past years the sole reason why Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.) stood opposed to each other in two separate and hostile camps. The developments of the recent period seem to show that differing world outlooks do not prohibit a reasonable relationship between the two states, and the restoration of cooperation of a new and friendly type. The period of opposition in foreign policy can be brought to an end once and for all and the way lies open for a new sort of future for both countries.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 1a
What does the Foreign Minister (FM) say is the “sole reason” for Germany and the USSR to stand opposed to each other?
Question 1b
How does FM Ribbentrop describe the desired new relationship Germany wants with the USSR?
Group 2
Source 2.1
- There exist no real conflicts of interest between Germany and the U.S.S.R. The living spaces of Germany and the U.S.S.R. touch each other, but in their natural requirements they do not conflict. Thus there is lacking all cause for an aggressive attitude on the part of one country against the other. Germany has no aggressive intentions against the U.S.S.R. The Reich Government is of the opinion that there is no question between the Baltic and the Black Seas which cannot be settled to the complete satisfaction of both countries. Among these are such questions as: the Baltic Sea, the Baltic area, Poland, Southeastern questions, etc. In such matters political cooperation between the two countries can have only a beneficial effect. The same applies to German and Soviet economy, which can be expanded in any direction.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Source 2.2
Planned division of Central Europe according to the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939.
Question 2a
What does Ribbentrop mention is a possible point of tension between the two countries?
Question 2b
What does FM Ribbentrop suggest is the answer to these “questions”?
Group 3
Source 3.1
- There is no doubt that German-Soviet policy today has come to an historic turning point. The decisions with respect to policy to be made in the immediate future in Berlin and Moscow will be of decisive importance for the aspect of relationships between the German people and the peoples of the U.S.S.R. for generations. On those decisions will depend whether the two peoples will some day again and without any compelling reason take up arms against each other or whether they pass again into a friendly relationship. It has gone well with both countries previously when they were friends and badly when they were enemies.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 3a
Highlight which word BEST describes the tone of FM Ribbentrop in this paragraph?
Question 3b
What words or phrases help you determine the answer for the last question?
Group 4
Source 4.1
- It is true that Germany and the U.S.S.R., as a result of years of hostility in their respective world outlooks, today look at each other in a distrustful fashion. A great deal of rubbish which has accumulated will have to be cleared away. It must be said, however, that even during this period the natural sympathy of the Germans for the Russians never disappeared. The policy of both states can be built anew on that basis.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 4a
What does the FM say is the foundation on which a new policy between Germany and the Soviet Union could be built, despite their hostile past and differing world views?
Group 5
Source 5.1
- The Reich Government and the Soviet Government must, judging from all experience, count it as certain that the capitalistic Western democracies are the unforgiving enemies of both National Socialist Germany and of the U.S.S.R. They are today trying again, by the conclusion of a military alliance, to drive the U.S.S.R. into the war against Germany. In 1914 this policy had disastrous results for Russia. It is the compelling interest of both countries to avoid for all future time the destruction of Germany and of the U.S.S.R., which would profit only the Western democracies.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 5a
Who does the FM say is a common enemy for the Soviet Union and Germany?
Question 5b
Who does the FM say will benefit if the Soviet Union and Germany fight each other?
Group 6
Source 6.1
- The crisis which has been produced in German-Polish relations by English policy, as well as English agitation for war and the attempts at an alliance which are bound up with that policy, make a speedy clarification of German-Russian relations desirable. Otherwise these matters, without any German initiative, might take a turn which would deprive both Governments of the possibility of restoring German-Soviet friendship and possibly of clearing up jointly the territorial questions of Eastern Europe. The leadership in both countries should, therefore not allow the situation to drift, but should take action at the proper time. It would be fatal if, through mutual lack of knowledge of views and intentions our peoples should be finally driven asunder.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 6a
What benefit does Germany offer the Soviet Union if they can solidify this new “German-Soviet friendship” in a “speedy” manner?
Group 7
Source 7.1
- As we have been informed, the Soviet Government also has the desire for a clarification of German-Russian relations. Since, however, according to previous experience this clarification can be achieved only slowly through the usual diplomatic channels, Reich Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop is prepared to make a short visit to Moscow in order, in the name of the Fuhrer (reference to Hitler), to set forth the Fuhrer's views to Herr (Mister) Stalin. Only through such a direct discussion, in the view of Herr von Ribbentrop, can a change be brought about, and it should not be impossible thereby to lay the foundations for a definite improvement in German-Russian relations.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 7a
Select the response which summarizes exactly what the FM is asking for in this paragraph?
Group 8
Source 8.1
- ANNEX: I request that you do not give Herr Molotov these instructions in writing, but that you read them to him. I consider it important that they reach Herr Stalin in as exact a form as possible and I authorize you at the same time to request from Herr Molotov on my behalf an audience with Herr Stalin so that you may be able to make this important communication directly to him also. In addition to a conference with Molotov, an extended conference with Stalin would be a condition for my making the trip. Herr Molotov is in reference to the Soviet Union’s foreign minister - Ribbentrop’s counterpart in the Soviet Union. FM Ribbentrop is asking to have this message read verbally to FM Molotov.
“The Avalon Project : Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941.” Avalon Project, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ns034.asp. Accessed 2 May 2023.
Question 8a
What condition does Ribbentrop want “for my making the trip”?
Group 9
Putting it all together:
This telegram from Germany to the Soviet Union happened on 14 August 1939. Both countries signed a nonaggression pact on 23 August 1939 and Germany invaded Poland on 1 September 1939 which started WWII.
Question 9a
Using at least one quote from the document above, write one sentence that describes the change in the relationship between the Soviet Union and Germany.
Question 9b
In this telegram the Germans tell the Soviet Union they have a common enemy and use that as motivation to begin working together. Describe a situation in which you have had to work with someone you normally wouldn’t because you had a common enemy/foe. Alternatively, provide a real life example from history or even today where 2 countries work together who typically wouldn’t so they could defeat a common enemy.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.