Fascist and Nazi Ideologies SAQ
*Whatever score the AI gives you, please take 1-2 points off just to be safe.
Group 1
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
Answer all parts of the question that follows
Question 1a
Identify ONE new state that emerged in Europe in the period before 1939.
Question 1b
Explain ONE development in Europe that led to the creation of new states in the period 1941-1939.
Question 1c
Explain ONE way in which the circumstances that led to the creation of new states in Europe in the period 1914-1939 contributed to the conflict in Europe in the period 1939-1945
Group 2
Use the passage to answer all parts of the question that follows.
Source 2.2
“In the aftermath of World War I, Japanese imperialism came to be rethought radically in the context of pan-Asianism, the new discourse of civilization that began at the time to burgeon in Japan and many other parts of [Asia]. Pan-Asianism meant different things to different people, even within Japan. There were those . . . who saw the Japanese role in pan-Asianism as nondomineering—oriented toward solidarity and the revival of Asia. [For others] pan-Asianism called for a final war between the West and the East led by Japan, which had amply demonstrated its leadership abilities. Pan-Asianism also had a special meaning for Japanese nationalists and thinkers during the 1920s because of the growing perception that, despite Japan's effort to become a worldclass nation-state . . . , the Japanese continued to encounter racism and discrimination. Discrimination was perceived in the international conferences in Washington (1922), the London Naval Conference (1930), and wherever Japan was allotted a lower quota of ships than the British and Americans. But most of all, it was the buildup of exclusionary policies in the United States and the final Exclusion Laws prohibiting Japanese immigration in 1924 that galled Japanese nationalists. In their view, Asian civilization did not exhibit inhuman racist attitudes and policies of this kind, and for [Japanese] militants . . . these ingrained civilizational differences would have to be fought out in a final, righteous war of the East against the West.”
Prasenjit Duara, Indian historian, article published in an academic journal, 2006
Question 2a
Identify ONE piece of evidence that Duara uses in the passage to support his claim regarding Western racial attitudes and Japanese militarism in the second paragraph.
Question 2b
Explain ONE development in the period before 1930 that would support Duara’s claim that Japan had “amply demonstrated its leadership abilities” as stated in the first paragraph.
Question 2c
Explain ONE way in which the ideology of Japanese pan-Asianism as described in the passage differed from the ideologies of other militarized states in the 1930s.
Group 3
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
Answer all parts of the question that follows
Question 3a
Identify and explain ONE difference between the fascist ideology of Mussolini and the Nazi ideology of Hitler.
Question 3b
Identify and explain ONE similarity between the fascist ideology of Mussolini and the Nazi ideology of Hitler.
Question 3c
Briefly explain ONE factor that contributed to the rise of fascism in Italy and Germany in the interwar period.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.