CAASPP Success - Grade 11 Reading Comprehension - Argumentative #2
Read the passage and answer the questions.
Question 1
What is the primary argument the author makes about specialization and interdisciplinary studies?
Specialization is the only way to achieve significant breakthroughs.
Interdisciplinary studies foster adaptability and innovation, while specialization can lead to significant contributions within a narrow field.
Being a specialist is more beneficial than being a generalist.
Interdisciplinary studies lack the depth needed for significant contributions.
Question 2
Write the specific sentence from the excerpt that highlights the main advantage of specialization.
"Specialization hones expertise in a single field, allowing individuals to dive deep and master a particular subject."
Question 3
How does the author use historical examples to support the argument for interdisciplinary education?
By showing that interdisciplinary education is a new concept.
By illustrating how historical figures like Leonardo da Vinci and Albert Einstein achieved success through integrating multiple fields.
By arguing that past educational reforms failed.
By highlighting failures of specialists in historical contexts.
Question 4
What reasoning does the author provide for why interdisciplinary thinkers might be more resilient and inventive in modern industries?
They have a deeper knowledge of their specific fields.
They use a diverse toolkit of skills and perspectives to adapt to rapidly changing industries and technologies.
They focus on one area of expertise without deviating from it.
They are often hired for lower-level positions due to their broad skill set.
Question 5
Based on the passage, which sentence best captures the author's view on the versatility of interdisciplinary knowledge in the job market?
Employers seek candidates who can contribute to different aspects of their organizations, from technical expertise to strategic thinking.
Interdisciplinary thinkers often achieve proficiency in multiple areas.
Educational reforms emphasized interdisciplinary approaches after World War I.
Students who engage in interdisciplinary programs develop stronger cognitive abilities.
Question 6
Which aspect of interdisciplinary education does the author argue is vital in addressing complex, real-world problems?
The possibility to specialize in one field.
The ability to draw connections across various disciplines to find creative solutions.
The opportunity for students to focus solely on technical subjects.
The potential to limit one's studies to a single domain.
Question 7
What evidence does the author provide to counter the argument that a "jack of all trades" lacks the depth to make significant contributions?
By stating that specialists can face challenges outside their area of expertise.
By mentioning that interdisciplinary thinkers often achieve proficiency in multiple areas and excel at synthesizing ideas from different fields.
By arguing that interdisciplinary education only prepares individuals for general roles.
By suggesting that single-discipline programs outperform interdisciplinary programs.
Question 8
In what way does the author propose interdisciplinary knowledge impacts personal life, beyond professional benefits?
By increasing technical skills.
By fostering meaningful conversations, deeper connections, and broader appreciation for the world.
By ensuring one's physical fitness.
By limiting one's interaction to specific subjects.
Question 9
How does the example of educational reforms after World War I support the author's argument?
It shows that there was a shift towards more exclusive technical training.
It demonstrates the practical success and enduring value of broad-based learning to address societal issues.
It emphasizes the failures of broad-based learning.
It illustrates that specialization was favored historically.
Question 10
What sentence from this excerpt supports the idea that interdisciplinary knowledge fosters mental agility?
"This mental agility allows individuals to tackle problems from various angles, adapting to new challenges with ease."
Question 11
What is the significance of including the study from "Innovative Higher Education" in the argument for interdisciplinary programs?
It provides empirical evidence that interdisciplinary programs enhance cognitive abilities and creativity.
It argues against the effectiveness of interdisciplinary programs.
It shows that interdisciplinary programs hinder problem-solving skills.
It emphasizes the limitations of traditional educational programs.
Question 12
What can be inferred about the author's view on the future of education and workforce demands?
Specialization will continue to dominate education and job markets.
Interdisciplinary skills and knowledge will be increasingly valuable and necessary.
Traditional educational models will become obsolete.
Physical and technical skills will no longer be relevant.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.