Citizenship 1865-1920: 2023 DBQ (Updated Rubric)

Question 1

Essay
Evaluate the extent to which the definitions of United States citizenship changed from 1865 to 1920. 
My friends, I am rejoiced that you are glad, but I don’t know how you will feel when I get through. I come from another field—the country of the slave. They have got their liberty—so much good luck to have slavery partly destroyed; not entirely. I want it root and branch destroyed. Then we will all be free indeed. . . . There is a great stir about colored men getting their rights, but not a word about the colored women; and if colored men get their rights, and not colored women theirs, . . . it will be just as bad as it was before. . . . I want women to have their rights. In the Courts women have no right, no voice; nobody speaks for them. . . . I have 
 been forty years a slave and forty years free and would be here forty years more to have equal rights for all. . . . There ought to be equal rights now more than ever, since colored people have got their freedom. 
Source: Sojourner Truth, speech given at the meeting of the American Equal Rights Association, 1867 Document 1
It is a matter not only of importance, but of necessity that the Indians acquire the English language as rapidly as possible. The Government has entered upon the great work of educating and citizenizing the Indians and establishing them upon homesteads. The adults are expected to assume the role of citizens, and of course the rising generation will be expected and required more nearly to fill the measure of citizenship, and the main purpose of educating them is to enable them to read, write, and speak the English language. . . . Only through the medium of the English tongue can they acquire a knowledge of the Constitution of the country and their rights and duties thereunder.

 . . . Deeming it for the very best interest of the Indian, both as an individual and as an embryo citizen, to have this policy strictly enforced among the various schools on Indian reservations, orders have been issued accordingly to Indian agents. . . 

. . . . The first step to be taken toward civilization, toward teaching the Indians the mischief and folly of continuing their barbarous practices, is to teach them the English language. 
Source: Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, annual report, 1887 Document 2
The fact, therefore, that acts of Congress or treaties have not permitted Chinese persons born out of this country to become citizens by naturalization, cannot exclude Chinese persons born in this country from the operation of the broad and clear words of the Constitution: “All persons born in the United States, and subject  to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” . . . 

The evident intention . . . of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question . . . , namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, . . . becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.
Source: United States Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 1898 Document 3
We are also of opinion that the power to acquire territory by treaty implies not only the power to govern such territory, but to prescribe upon what terms the United States will receive its inhabitants, and what their status shall be in what Chief Justice Marshall termed the “American empire.” . . . Indeed, it is doubtful if Congress would ever assent to the annexation of territory upon the condition that its inhabitants, however foreign they may be to our habits, traditions, and modes of life, shall become at once citizens of the United States. In all its treaties hitherto the treaty-making power has made special provisions for this subject. . . . In all these cases there is an implied denial of the right of the inhabitants to American citizenship until Congress by further action shall signify its assent thereto. . . . 

It is obvious that in the annexation of outlying and distant possessions, grave questions will arise from differences of race, habits, laws, and customs of the people, and from differences of soil, climate, and production which may require action on the part of Congress that would be quite unnecessary in the annexation of contiguous territory inhabited only by people of the same race, or by scattered bodies of native Indians. 
Source: United States Supreme Court ruling in Downes v. Bidwell, 1901 Document 4
I am by birth and law a free black American citizen. As such I have both rights and duties. If I neglect my duties my rights are always in danger. If I do not maintain my rights I cannot perform my duties. . . . 

I will not, because of inertia or timidity or even sensitiveness, allow new discriminations to become usual and habitual. To this end I will make it my duty without ostentation, but with firmness, to assert my right to vote, to frequent places of public entertainment and to appear as a man among men. I will religiously do this from time to time, even when personally I prefer the refuge of friends and family. . . . 

I will be a man and know myself to be one, even among those who secretly and openly deny my manhood, and I shall persistently and unwaveringly seek by every possible method to compel all men to treat me as I treat them. 
Source: W. E. B. Du Bois, “A Philosophy for 1913,” The Crisis, 1913 Document 5
The provisions of this Act shall apply to the island of Porto Rico. 1

Sec. 2. That no law shall be enacted in Porto Rico which shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or deny to any person therein the equal protection of the laws. . . . 

Sec. 5. That all citizens of Porto Rico . . . and all natives of Porto Rico who were temporarily absent from that island . . . , and have since returned and are permanently residing in that island, and are not citizens of any foreign country, are hereby declared, and shall be deemed and held to be, citizens of the United States. . . . 

Sec. 10. That all judicial process shall run in the name of “United States of America” . . . ; and all officials shall be citizens of the United States, and, before entering upon the duties of their respective offices, shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the laws of Porto Rico. 

1 An alternative spelling for Puerto Rico used at the time 
Source: Jones-Shafroth Act, 1917 Document 6

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other U.S. History Assignments

10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic11.1 Colonial Foundations11.1 Colonial Foundations11.2c: From the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution11.2 CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS (1763 – 1824)11.2d: U.S. Government Foundations: Key Developments and Precedents11.2 Reliability - Declaration of Independence11.3 Reliability - Monroe Doctrine1.2 Compare Native Americans in Two Regions1.2 Compare Native Americans in Two Regions1.3 & 1.4 Extent Transatlantic Voyages affected the Americas1 - 4.6 (a) Market Revolution: Society and Culture1 - 4.6 (b) Market Revolution: Society and Culture1 - 4.8 (a) Jackson and Federal Power1 - 4.8 (b) Jackson and Federal Power1 - 4.8 (c) Jackson and Federal Power1492-1700 Interactions with Native Americans1.4 Extent the Columbian Exchange fostered Change(1.4) SAQ - THE COLUMBIAN EXCHANGE14th & 15th Amendments 1865-18771.6 Change because of Interactions Between Europeans & Native Americans1920s: Cultural and Political Controversies1920s Cultural Developments1920s DBQ1920s SAQ1945-Present Unit Exam Reassessment1950s conformity19th Century Immigration and Economic Growth in the United States19th Century Industrialists: Captains of Industry or Robber Barons1 Doc DBQ Antebellum Women1 Doc DBQ Antebellum Women2000 DBQ: Organized Labor's Success in Improving Workers' Position (1875-1900)2018 DBQ Role of US in the World 1865-19102018 Practice Exam - Q1: Historians on the Civil War2018 Practice Exam - Q2: Tire Advertisement - explain2018 Practice Exam - Q3: Compare First Great Awakening to Enlightenment2018 Practice Exam - Q4: Compare Korean War to Vietnam War2018 Practice Exam - Q5: Extent of Change in U.S. Foreign Policy2019 DBQ2019 International Practice Exam DBQ2019 International Practice Exam LEQ2019 International Practice Exam SAQ2019 International Practice Exam SAQ (Required)2023 LEQ Colonial Societies Revolution2.0 Colonial Dynamics and the Fur Trade2.0 Colonial Grievances and Responses: The Case of Nathaniel Bacon2.0 Comparative Goals in Spanish and English Colonial Expansion