EBQ: ACES and Schizophrenia
This question has three parts: Part A, Part B, and Part C. Use the three sources provided to answer all parts of the question.
For Part B and Part C, you must cite the source that you used to answer the question. You can do this in two different ways:
- Parenthetical Citation: For example: “...(Source 1)”
- Embedded Citation: For example: “According to Source 1,...”
Write the response to each part of the question in complete sentences. Use appropriate psychological terminology.
Introduction: Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder characterized by positive symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) and negative symptoms (apathy, social withdrawal). Research suggests a complex interplay between genetics and environmental factors in its development. This study investigates whether experiencing Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs), such as physical or emotional abuse, neglect, or household dysfunction, contributes to the risk of developing schizophrenia. Studies:
Study 1: The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study (1972-present)
Introduction:
The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study (also known as the Dunedin Study) is a long-running longitudinal cohort study that investigates the health outcomes of individuals born in Dunedin, New Zealand, in 1972-73. The study has provided valuable insights into the impact of childhood adversity, particularly adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), on mental health outcomes across the lifespan. This study examines the association between ACEs and the development of schizophrenia in adulthood.Participants:
The study originally enrolled 1,037 individuals born between April 1, 1972, and March 31, 1973, in Dunedin, New Zealand. The participants have been followed for over 40 years, providing rich longitudinal data. The cohort includes both male and female participants, and it is ethnically homogeneous, consisting predominantly of European descent. The study has a high retention rate, with approximately 90% of participants continuing to engage in data collection throughout the course of the study.Methodology:
ACEs were assessed using standardized interviews at ages 11 and 13, where participants were asked about a variety of adversities experienced during childhood, such as abuse, neglect, household dysfunction, and family mental health issues. These assessments provided a cumulative ACE score for each individual, ranging from 0 to 4 or more.
Schizophrenia diagnoses were confirmed through clinical interviews and by reviewing hospital records in adulthood, typically when participants were in their 30s or 40s. The clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia was based on standardized criteria, including DSM-IV criteria, and confirmed by expert clinicians who reviewed the participant’s psychiatric history and symptoms.Results:
The study found a clear relationship between the number of ACEs and the likelihood of developing schizophrenia later in life. Specifically, individuals who reported experiencing four or more ACEs were 3.2 times more likely to develop schizophrenia compared to individuals who reported no ACEs. This risk was progressively higher as the number of ACEs increased, underscoring the cumulative nature of childhood adversity.Figure 1:
Risk of Schizophrenia by Number of ACEs (Dunedin Study)
[Insert a bar graph here with X-axis labeled "Number of ACEs" and Y-axis labeled "Risk of Schizophrenia." Bar 1 (0 ACEs) should be shortest, with bars increasing in height for 1 ACE, 2 ACEs, 3 ACEs, and 4+ ACEs (tallest).]Discussion:
The Dunedin Study provides robust longitudinal evidence supporting the hypothesis that childhood adversity, particularly ACEs, is a significant risk factor for developing schizophrenia later in life. This research emphasizes the importance of early intervention and support for children who experience multiple adversities, as the impact of such experiences may extend into adulthood. The findings suggest that addressing ACEs in childhood could potentially reduce the risk of mental health disorders like schizophrenia in later years. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms through which ACEs contribute to the development of mental illnesses, as well as to identify potential preventative strategies.
Study 2: National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) (2001-2003)
Introduction: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) is one of the largest epidemiological studies to assess the prevalence of mental disorders and their correlates across a diverse population in the United States. This study is particularly valuable for understanding the relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and the onset of mental disorders, including schizophrenia. Previous research, including the Dunedin study, has indicated a potential association between early adversity and the risk for developing schizophrenia, but the NCS-R aimed to further clarify this relationship across a national sample.
Participants: The NCS-R involved over 9,000 participants, aged 18 years and older, from various demographic backgrounds across the United States. These individuals were selected through a stratified multistage area probability sampling design, which ensured that the sample was representative of the broader U.S. population. Participants were asked to report on their lifetime experiences with mental disorders, as well as childhood adversity. The study's diverse sample allowed for an examination of how ACEs might affect mental health outcomes across different populations.
Methodology: The NCS-R utilized a series of structured interviews and self-reported questionnaires to assess participants' mental health history. Specifically, the study included questions about Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), which encompass various forms of childhood trauma, such as abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Schizophrenia diagnoses were assessed through diagnostic interviews, with the lifetime prevalence of schizophrenia and any psychotic symptoms explored. To ensure that the findings were not confounded by other variables, researchers controlled for several potential confounders, including socioeconomic status, age, gender, and other sociodemographic factors. The study design was cross-sectional, which limited the ability to infer causality, but it allowed for robust correlation between ACEs and schizophrenia diagnoses.
Results: The NCS-R found a clear dose-response relationship between the number of ACEs reported and the likelihood of being diagnosed with schizophrenia. Specifically, individuals with a history of any ACEs were more likely to have a lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia than those without any childhood adversity. Furthermore, those with multiple ACEs had an even higher risk of being diagnosed with schizophrenia, suggesting that the cumulative impact of early trauma may play a significant role in the onset of psychotic disorders. The study’s findings also emphasized the importance of controlling for confounding variables, as the relationship between ACEs and schizophrenia persisted even after adjusting for factors such as socioeconomic status.
Discussion: The NCS-R study adds substantial weight to the growing body of evidence suggesting a link between ACEs and schizophrenia. The findings align with previous studies, including the Dunedin cohort study, which demonstrated a similar association in a more specific population. However, the NCS-R study is notable for its large, representative sample, which allows for generalization of the results to a broader population. The dose-response relationship observed further strengthens the argument that the more severe the early adversities, the higher the risk for developing schizophrenia. This study highlights the importance of early intervention and preventive measures to reduce childhood adversity, which could potentially mitigate the risk for developing serious mental health disorders like schizophrenia.
APA Citation: Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617
Introduction
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) have long been linked to various mental health disorders, including schizophrenia. Schizophrenia, a severe mental illness characterized by distorted thinking, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors, can significantly impair an individual's functioning. Research has suggested that ACEs, such as abuse, neglect, or family dysfunction, may contribute to the onset of schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals. The Maudsley Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Study (2001-2009) aimed to explore the relationship between ACEs and the development of schizophrenia, focusing on both psychological and biological factors that could mediate this association.
Participants
The study involved two groups of participants: 265 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and 221 healthy controls, all recruited from the United Kingdom. The schizophrenia group consisted of individuals who had been diagnosed based on standardized diagnostic criteria, ensuring the homogeneity of the sample. The healthy control group was carefully matched in terms of age, gender, and socio-economic background, but without any history of mental illness, particularly schizophrenia. These controls allowed for comparisons regarding the impact of ACEs between those with and without the disorder.
Method
The methodology employed by the Maudsley study was multifaceted, consisting of interviews, standardized assessments, and neuroimaging. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with all participants to gather detailed information on their childhood experiences, specifically focusing on ACEs. These assessments were structured to ensure consistency across participants, allowing for reliable comparisons.
In addition to psychological assessments, the study utilized neuroimaging techniques, including brain scans, to examine potential biological markers associated with schizophrenia. These brain scans, particularly those targeting the hippocampus, provided valuable insight into how structural brain abnormalities may be linked to ACEs and schizophrenia. The hippocampus is a region of the brain heavily involved in memory processing and emotional regulation, both of which are often disrupted in schizophrenia.
Results
The results from the Maudsley study revealed significant differences between the schizophrenia group and the healthy controls regarding childhood adversity. Individuals with schizophrenia reported a markedly higher incidence of ACEs than those in the control group. This finding supports previous research suggesting that early adverse experiences may increase the vulnerability to developing schizophrenia later in life.
Furthermore, the study uncovered a critical biological connection between ACEs and schizophrenia. Participants with a history of more ACEs exhibited reduced grey matter volume in the hippocampus. This decrease in brain volume, particularly in a region linked to memory and emotional regulation, suggests that childhood adversity may contribute to structural brain changes that predispose individuals to schizophrenia. The hippocampus’s role in both emotional regulation and cognitive functions, such as memory, might explain some of the symptoms observed in schizophrenia.
Discussion
The Maudsley study provides compelling evidence supporting the link between ACEs and the development of schizophrenia, highlighting not only psychological factors but also biological ones. The reduced hippocampal volume observed in individuals with more ACEs suggests that structural changes in the brain may act as mediators in the pathway between childhood adversity and the onset of schizophrenia. These findings align with other research indicating that early traumatic experiences can have long-lasting effects on brain development, influencing the brain's vulnerability to mental health disorders.
The results also reinforce the notion that schizophrenia is a multifactorial disorder, with both genetic and environmental factors contributing to its onset. While the biological basis of schizophrenia remains complex, this study suggests that early-life adversity may play a critical role in shaping the brain's response to stress and emotional regulation, potentially triggering or exacerbating the disorder.
Conclusion
The Maudsley Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Study strengthens the body of research indicating that ACEs are associated with an increased risk of developing schizophrenia. The combination of longitudinal, cross-sectional, and case-control data consistently supports the positive correlation between ACEs and schizophrenia. Additionally, the study offers insights into potential biological mechanisms, such as reduced hippocampal volume, which may mediate this relationship. These findings underscore the importance of early interventions for children who experience adversity, as addressing these early-life stressors could potentially reduce the risk of developing mental health disorders like schizophrenia. Future research should continue to explore both the psychological and biological pathways through which ACEs influence the development of psychiatric conditions to inform better prevention and treatment strategies.
Question 1
Using the sources provided, develop and justify an argument about a note-taking technique that is more likely to improve memory retrieval.
(Part A-Claim-1) Propose a specific and defensible claim based in psychological science that responds to the question.
Question 2
(Part B-Evidence-1) Support your claim using at least one piece of specific and relevant evidence from one of the sources. (with citation)
Question 3
(Part B Explanation-1, Psychology application-1) Explain how the evidence from Part B previous question supports your claim using a psychological perspective, theory, concept, or research finding learned in AP Psychology.
Question 4
(Part C-Evidence-1) Support your claim using an additional piece of specific and relevant evidence from a different source that the one that was used in previous question. (2nd piece of evidence from provided source)
Question 5
(Part C-Explanation-1 and Psychology application-1) Explain how the evidence from previous question (evidence 2) supports your claim using a different psychological perspective, theory, concept, or research finding learned in AP Psychology different from the one used previously.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.