Subjects /Psychology /Assignments /

AAQ - Conformity

Question 1

Essay
Question #2: Article Analysis Question
Your response to the question should be provided in six parts: A, B, C, D, E, and F.  Write the response to each part of the question in complete sentences.  Use appropriate psychological terminology in your response.
2. Using the source provided, respond to the following questions.
A. Identify the research method used in the study.
B. State the operational definition of conformity.
C. Describe the meaning of the differences in the percentages of participants conforming to the group answer at the different group sizes.
D. Identify at least one ethical guideline applied by the researchers.
E. Explain the extent to which the research findings may or may not be generalizable using specific and relevant evidence from the study.
F. Explain how at least one of the research findings supports or refutes the researcher’s hypothesis that subjects would conform to incorrect answers given unanimously by a group, even when the subject knew the answer was incorrect.

Asch Conformity Studies
Introduction
Solomon Asch's conformity studies, conducted in the 1950s, sought to illuminate the power of social pressure on individual judgment. His research demonstrated that people could be influenced to conform to the beliefs and opinions of a group, even when those beliefs were clearly incorrect.
Participants
5
Asch's original study involved 50 male students from Swarthmore College. These participants were placed in groups of 7 to 9 individuals. However, only one individual in each group was a genuine participant; all others were confederates instructed to behave in specific ways.
Methods
Line Judgment Task: Participants were shown a standard line and then asked to choose the matching line from a set of three comparison lines. The task was purposely straightforward, with a clearly correct answer.
Intentional Errors: Confederates were instructed to unanimously select the same incorrect line on predetermined "critical trials." The unsuspecting participant was placed in a position where they had to choose between their own perception and the group consensus.
In additional variations of the original research, Asch modified things like having another person who would break from the group consensus or varying the group size.  These changes showed additional aspects of the conformity effect.
10
Data
Asch recorded the number of instances where the participant conformed with the group's incorrect answer versus times they chose the correct answer. Interviews with participants after the study shed light on their motivations for conforming or not.
Results
Asch's results were startling:
Conformity Rates: Approximately 75% of participants conformed to the incorrect group judgment at least once. Overall, conformity occurred in 37% of critical trials.
15
Individual Differences: While many conformed, 25% of the participants never yielded to the group's incorrect judgment.
The relationship between group size and conformity
20
Conclusions
Asch's research highlighted the power of conformity in influencing individual judgments and behavior. The pressure to fit in with the group, even when the group is demonstrably wrong, can be a powerful force. His work has significantly impacted our understanding of social influence and group dynamics.
Asch's conformity studies offered several key insights:
Power of Social Pressure: Even in simple, unambiguous situations, individuals often yield to group pressure, aligning their answers with the majority despite recognizing the error.
25
Factors Influencing Conformity: Asch identified variations in conformity rates based on factors such as group size, task difficulty, and whether responses were made privately or publicly.
Motivations to Conform: Participants cited a desire to fit in, avoid social disapproval, and a belief that the group might be right as motivators for conformity.
Citation
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
Asch, S. E. (1951). Opinions and social pressure. Psychological Monographs, 65(9, Whole No. 377).
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.
Other Psychology Assignments
10/26 - Pilliavin Case Study Mastery Check-in2.6 The Brain Practice FRQ3.3.A FRQ Practice (define and apply psychological concepts)AAQ AAQ - Adequate SleepAAQ: Aggression and Personality AAQ: Caffeine and Memory AAQ Caffeine and Reaction TimeAAQ: Cell Phone and StressAAQ Cell - Phone Impact on MemoryAAQ Cell - Phone Impact on MemoryAAQ Cell Phone Use and Academic PerformanceAAQ: COGNITIVE DISSONANCEAAQ - ConformityAAQ - Conformity in a Shopping MallAAQ - Corpus CallosumAAQ - Corpus CallosumAAQ Creatine and Athletic PerformanceAAQ - Daily ObjectiveAAQ: Depth PerceptionAAQ: Depth PerceptionAAQ for AP Psychology "I Can See It All Over Your Face!" - Paul EkmanAAQ for AP Psychology "I Can See It All Over Your Face!" - Paul EkmanAAQ for AP Psychology "I Can See It All Over Your Face!" - Paul EkmanAAQ from the CED on Multivitamin and MemoryAAQ from the CED on Multivitamin and MemoryAAQ-GPA and JobsAAQ - Grit and Achieving GoalsAAQ - Grit and Achieving GoalsAAQ - Hindsight BiasAAQ: Memory and SleepAAQ - MilgramAAQ: Multivitamin and MemoryAAQ - Negligent Use of Social MediaAAQ - Observational Learning - Bobo Doll ExperimentAAQ - Observational Learning - Bobo Doll ExperimentAAQ on SerotoninAAQ- Phone Usage and GradesAAQ Serotonin AAQ Serotonin AAQ Serotonin and emotional stabilityAAQ- Sleep and Daytime FunctioningAAQ-Social Media and Self-EsteemAAQ  Stimulating environment and rat brainsAAQ  Stimulating environment and rat brainsAAQ  Stimulating environment and rat brainsAAQ - Synesthesia and CreativityAAQ | Unit 1.3.B.2 SerotoninAAQ | Unit 4.2.B.2 Cognitive Dissonance