AP Success - AP US History: Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Views
Source 1
" It appears from these articles that there is no need of any intervention of the state governments, between the Congress and the people, to execute anyone power vested in the general government, and that the constitution and laws of every state are nullified and declared void, so far as they are or shall be inconsistent with this constitution, or the laws made in pursuance of it, or with treaties made under the authority of the United States. The government then, so far as it extends, is a complete one, and not a confederation. It is as much one complete government as that of New-York or Massachusetts, has as absolute and perfect powers to make and execute all laws, to appoint officers, institute courts, declare offences, and annex penalties, with respect to every object to which it extends, as any other in the world. So far therefore as its powers reach, all ideas of confederation are given up and lost."
Brutus I, 1787
Question 1
The author of 'Brutus I' is expressing concerns primarily associated with which group during the ratification debates?
Question 2
According to 'Brutus I', what is the author's view on the power of the federal government as proposed by the Constitution?
Question 3
What concern does 'Brutus I' raise about the relationship between federal and state laws?
Question 4
The argument presented in 'Brutus I' can be seen as a reaction to which feature of the proposed Constitution?
Question 5
Which of the following best summarizes the author's perspective on the nature of the government created by the Constitution?
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.