4.8 Jackson and Federal Power

“He [Jackson] believed that removal was the Indians’ only salvation against
certain extinction. . . .
Not that the President was motivated by concerns for the Indians . . . .
5
Andrew Jackson was motivated principally by two considerations: first . . .
military safety . . . that Indians must not occupy areas that might jeopardize
the defense of this nation; and second, . . . the principle that all persons
residing within states are subject to the jurisdiction and laws of those
states. . . .
10
Would it have been worse had the Indians remained in the East? Jackson
thought so. He said that they would ‘disappear and be forgotten.’ One thing
does seem certain: the Indians would have been forced to yield to state laws
and white society. Indian Nations per se would have been obliterated.”
Robert V. Remini, historian, Andrew Jackson: The Course of American Freedom, 1822–1832, 1998
“The Georgia legislature passed a law extending the state’s jurisdiction . . .
over the Cherokees living within the state.
Georgia’s action forced the President’s hand. He must see to it that a
5
removal policy long covertly pursued by the White House would now be
enacted into law by Congress. . . .
Jackson as usual spoke publicly in a tone of friendship and concern for
Indian welfare. . . . He, as President, could be their friend only if they
10
removed beyond the Mississippi, where they should have a ‘land of their
own, which they shall possess as long as Grass grows or water runs . . . .’
A harsh policy was nevertheless quickly put in place.
15
It is abundantly clear that Jackson and his administration were determined
to permit the extension of state sovereignty because it would result in the
harassment of Indians, powerless to resist, by speculators and intruders
hungry for Indian land.”
Anthony F. C. Wallace, historian, The Long, Bitter Trail: Andrew Jackson and the Indians, 1993

Question 1

Short answer
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Remini’s and
Wallace’s historical interpretations of Jackson’s Indian removal
policies.

Question 2

Short answer
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development
in the period 1824 to 1844 that is not explicitly mentioned in the
excerpts could be used to support Remini’s interpretation.

Question 3

Short answer
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development
in the period 1824 to 1844 that is not explicitly mentioned in the
excerpts could be used to support Wallace’s interpretation.

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other U.S. History Assignments

10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic11.1 Colonial Foundations11.1 Colonial Foundations11.2c: From the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution11.2 CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS (1763 – 1824)11.2d: U.S. Government Foundations: Key Developments and Precedents11.2 Reliability - Declaration of Independence11.3 Reliability - Monroe Doctrine1.2 Compare Native Americans in Two Regions1.2 Compare Native Americans in Two Regions1.3 & 1.4 Extent Transatlantic Voyages affected the Americas1 - 4.6 (a) Market Revolution: Society and Culture1 - 4.6 (b) Market Revolution: Society and Culture1 - 4.8 (a) Jackson and Federal Power1 - 4.8 (b) Jackson and Federal Power1 - 4.8 (c) Jackson and Federal Power1492-1700 Interactions with Native Americans1.4 Extent the Columbian Exchange fostered Change(1.4) SAQ - THE COLUMBIAN EXCHANGE14th & 15th Amendments 1865-18771.6 Change because of Interactions Between Europeans & Native Americans1920s: Cultural and Political Controversies1920s Cultural Developments1920s DBQ1920s SAQ1945-Present Unit Exam Reassessment1950s conformity19th Century Immigration and Economic Growth in the United States19th Century Industrialists: Captains of Industry or Robber Barons1 Doc DBQ Antebellum Women1 Doc DBQ Antebellum Women2000 DBQ: Organized Labor's Success in Improving Workers' Position (1875-1900)2018 DBQ Role of US in the World 1865-19102018 Practice Exam - Q1: Historians on the Civil War2018 Practice Exam - Q2: Tire Advertisement - explain2018 Practice Exam - Q3: Compare First Great Awakening to Enlightenment2018 Practice Exam - Q4: Compare Korean War to Vietnam War2018 Practice Exam - Q5: Extent of Change in U.S. Foreign Policy2019 DBQ2019 International Practice Exam DBQ2019 International Practice Exam LEQ2019 International Practice Exam SAQ2019 International Practice Exam SAQ (Required)2023 LEQ Colonial Societies Revolution2.0 Colonial Dynamics and the Fur Trade2.0 Colonial Grievances and Responses: The Case of Nathaniel Bacon2.0 Comparative Goals in Spanish and English Colonial Expansion