Atomic Bomb Justified

Reminder, do not use “I” and write in PAST tense.
THESIS:
EVIDENCE (Paraphrase)
EXPLAIN HOW EVIDENCE SUPPORTS YOUR THESIS (Hint: Explain why the evidence you chose makes dropping the bomb justified or not) 
SOURCE
EVIDENCE (Paraphrase)
EXPLAIN HOW EVIDENCE SUPPORTS YOUR THESIS(Hint: Explain why the evidence you chose makes dropping the bomb justified or not) 
SOURCE
NO PASTING
The following is from a book written by a historian about how people remember wars. John W. Dower explains the two different ways that the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is remembered. 
“Hiroshima as Victimization”
Japanese still recall the war experience primarily in terms of their own victimization. For them, World War II calls to mind the deaths of family and acquaintances on distant battlefields, and, more vividly, the prolonged, systematic bombings of their cities. If it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender, how does one justify the hasty bombing of Nagasaki only three days later, before the Japanese had time to investigate Hiroshima and formulate a response? 
“Hiroshima as Triumph”
To most Americans, Hiroshima—the shattered, atomized, irradiated city – remains largely a symbol of triumph – marking the end of a horrendous global conflict and the effective demonstration of a weapon that has prevented another world war. It is hard to imagine that the Japanese would have surrendered without the atomic bomb. Japanese battle plans that were in place when the bombs were dropped called for a massive, suicidal defense of the home islands, in which the imperial government would mobilize not only several million fighting men but also millions of ordinary citizens who had been trained and indoctrinated to resist to the end with primitive makeshift weapons. For Japanese to even discuss capitulation (surrender) was seditious (against the law).
Source 1: Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W. Dower, 1996
Even before the bomb was tested, American officials began to debate how to use it. Admiral William Leahy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, opposed using the bomb because it killed civilians indiscriminately. He believed that an economic blockade and conventional bombing would convince Japan to surrender. Secretary of War Henry Stimson wanted to warn the Japanese about the bomb while at the same time telling them that they could keep the emperor if they surrendered. Secretary of State James Byrnes, however, wanted to drop the bomb without any warning to shock Japan into surrendering. President Truman later wrote that he “regarded the bomb as a military weapon and never had any doubts that it should be used.” His advisers had warned him to expect massive casualties if the United States invaded Japan. Truman believed it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save American lives. 
Source 2: American History Textbook, American Vision, pg. 615
Thank God for the Atomic Bomb My division, like most of the ones transferred from Europe was going to take part in the invasion at Honshu (an island of Japan). The people who preferred invasion to A-bombing seemed to have no intention of proceeding to the Japanese front themselves. I have already noted what a few more days would mean to the luckless troops and sailors on the spot…. On Okinawa, only a few weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other. War is immoral. War is cruel.
Source 3: Paul Fussell, a World War II Soldier, Thank God for the Atom Bomb, 1990
  “[Byrnes] was concerned about Russia's postwar behavior. Russian troops had moved into Hungary and Romania, and Byrnes thought it would be very difficult to persuade Russia to withdraw her troops from these countries, that Russia might be more manageable if impressed by American military might, and that a demonstration of the bomb might impress Russia.”
Source 4: James Byrnes was one of Truman's advisors on the atomic bomb. In addition to defeating Japan, he wanted to keep the Soviet Union from expanding its influence in Asia and to limit its influence in Europe. Manhattan Project scientist Leo Szilard met with Byrnes on May 28, 1945. Leo Szilard wrote about his meeting with Byrnes in 1980.
Survivor One of my classmates, I think his name is Fujimoto, he muttered something and pointed outside the window, saying, “A B-29 is coming.” He pointed outside with his finger. So I began to get up from my chair and asked him, “Where is it?” Looking in the direction that he was pointing towards, I got up on my feet, but I was not yet in an upright position when it happened. All I can remember was a pale lightening flash for two or three seconds. Then, I collapsed. I don’t know much time passed before I came to. It was awful, awful. The smoke was coming in from somewhere above the debris. Sandy dust was flying around. . . I crawled over the debris, trying to find someone who were still alive. Then, I found one of my classmates lying alive. I held him up in my arms. It is hard to tell, his skull was cracked open, his flesh was dangling out from his head. He had only one eye left, and it was looking right at me. . . . he told me to go away. I, so, was running, hands were trying to grab my ankles, they were asking me to take them along. I was only a child then. And I was horrified at so many hands trying to grab me. I was in pain, too. So all I could do was to get rid of them, it s terrible to say, but I kicked their hands away. I still feel bad about that. I went to Miyuki Bridge to get some water. At the river bank, I saw so many people collapsed there. . . I was small, so I pushed on the river along the small steps. The water was dead people. I had to push the bodies aside to drink the muddy water. We didn’t know anything about radioactivity that time. I stood up in the water and so many bodies were floating away along the stream.
Source 5: Yoshitaka Kawamoto was thirteen years old. He was in the classroom at Zakoba-cho, 0.8 kilometers away from the hypocenter. He is now working as the director of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, telling visitors from all over the world what the atomic bomb did to the people of Hiroshima.
Estimates of Casualties	
Hiroshima 						
Pre-raid population: 		255,000
Dead:				  66,000
5
Injured:				  69,000			
Nagasaki
Pre-raid population:		195,000
Dead 			  	  39,000
Injured 		  		  25,000
10
Cause of death: 
Burns:				     77%
Falling Debris		 	      9%
Flying Glass	 		       7%
Other				       7%
Source 6: United States Government Report, 1946
Source 7 Picture of Hiroshima after the bomb 

Question 1

Short answer
Using the documents above write a full paragraph (minimum 7 sentences) with at least 2 pieces of evidence, taking a stance as to whether or not you believe the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. You must cite at least 2 sources.
Was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified? 
NO PASTING

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other U.S. History Assignments

10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic10/4: Foreign Policy in the Early Republic11.1 Colonial Foundations11.1 Colonial Foundations11.2c: From the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution11.2 CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS (1763 – 1824)11.2d: U.S. Government Foundations: Key Developments and Precedents11.2 Reliability - Declaration of Independence11.3 Reliability - Monroe Doctrine1.2 Compare Native Americans in Two Regions1.2 Compare Native Americans in Two Regions1.3 & 1.4 Extent Transatlantic Voyages affected the Americas1 - 4.6 (a) Market Revolution: Society and Culture1 - 4.6 (b) Market Revolution: Society and Culture1 - 4.8 (a) Jackson and Federal Power1 - 4.8 (b) Jackson and Federal Power1 - 4.8 (c) Jackson and Federal Power1492-1700 Interactions with Native Americans1.4 Extent the Columbian Exchange fostered Change(1.4) SAQ - THE COLUMBIAN EXCHANGE14th & 15th Amendments 1865-18771.6 Change because of Interactions Between Europeans & Native Americans1920s: Cultural and Political Controversies1920s Cultural Developments1920s DBQ1920s SAQ1945-Present Unit Exam Reassessment1950s conformity19th Century Immigration and Economic Growth in the United States19th Century Industrialists: Captains of Industry or Robber Barons1 Doc DBQ Antebellum Women1 Doc DBQ Antebellum Women2000 DBQ: Organized Labor's Success in Improving Workers' Position (1875-1900)2018 DBQ Role of US in the World 1865-19102018 Practice Exam - Q1: Historians on the Civil War2018 Practice Exam - Q2: Tire Advertisement - explain2018 Practice Exam - Q3: Compare First Great Awakening to Enlightenment2018 Practice Exam - Q4: Compare Korean War to Vietnam War2018 Practice Exam - Q5: Extent of Change in U.S. Foreign Policy2019 DBQ2019 International Practice Exam DBQ2019 International Practice Exam LEQ2019 International Practice Exam SAQ2019 International Practice Exam SAQ (Required)2023 LEQ Colonial Societies Revolution2.0 Colonial Dynamics and the Fur Trade2.0 Colonial Grievances and Responses: The Case of Nathaniel Bacon2.0 Comparative Goals in Spanish and English Colonial Expansion