Rhetorical Analysis of Margaret Thatcher's Eulogy for Ronald Reagan

1

On June 11, 2004, Margaret Thatcher, the former prime minister of Great Britain, delivered the following eulogy to  the American people in honor of former United States president Ronald Reagan, with whom she had worked closely.  Read the eulogy carefully. Then, in a well-developed essay, analyze the rhetorical strategies that Thatcher uses to  convey her message.  

In your response you should do the following: 
• Respond to the prompt with a thesis that analyzes the writer’s rhetorical choices.
 • Select and use evidence to support your line of reasoning. 
• Explain how the evidence supports your line of reasoning. 
• Demonstrate an understanding of the rhetorical situation. 
• Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your argument. 
We have lost a great president, a great American, and a great man, and I have lost a dear friend. In his lifetime, Ronald Reagan was such a cheerful and invigorating presence that it was easy to forget what daunting historic tasks he set himself. He sought to mend America’s wounded spirit, to restore the strength of the free world, and to free the slaves of communism. These were causes hard to accomplish and heavy with risk, yet they were pursued with almost a lightness of spirit, for Ronald Reagan also embodied another great cause, what Arnold Bennett once called “the great cause of cheering us all up.” His policies had a freshness and optimism that won converts from every class and every nation, and ultimately, from the very heart of the “evil empire.” Yet his humour often had a purpose beyond humour. In the terrible hours after the attempt on his life, his easy jokes gave reassurance to an anxious world. They were evidence that in the aftermath of terror and in the midst of hysteria one great heart at least remained sane and jocular. They were truly grace under pressure. And perhaps they signified grace of a deeper kind. Ronnie himself certainly believed that he had been given back his life for a purpose. As he told a priest after his recovery, “Whatever time I’ve got left now belongs to the big fella upstairs.” And surely, it is hard to deny that Ronald Reagan’s life was providential when we look at what he achieved in the eight years that followed. Others prophesied the decline of the West. He inspired America and its allies with renewed faith in their mission of freedom. Others saw only limits to growth. He transformed a stagnant economy into an engine of opportunity. Others hoped, at best, for an uneasy cohabitation with the Soviet Union. He won the Cold War, not only without firing a shot, but also by inviting enemies out of their fortress and turning them into friends. I cannot imagine how any diplomat or any dramatist could improve on his words to Mikhail Gorbachev at the Geneva summit. “Let me tell you why it is we distrust you.” Those words are candid and tough, and they cannot have been easy to hear. But they are also a clear invitation to a new beginning and a new relationship that would be rooted in trust. We live today in the world that Ronald Reagan began to reshape with those words. It is a very different world, with different challenges and new dangers. All in all, however, it is one of greater freedom and prosperity, one more hopeful than the world he inherited on becoming president. As Prime Minister, I worked closely with Ronald Reagan for eight of the most important years of all our lives. We talked regularly, both before and after his presidency, and I’ve had time and cause to reflect on what made him a great president. Ronald Reagan knew his own mind. He had firm principles and, I believe, right ones. He expounded them clearly. He acted upon them decisively. When the world threw problems at the White House, he was not baffled or disorientated or overwhelmed. He knew almost instinctively what to do. When his aides were preparing option papers for his decision, they were able to cut out entire rafts of proposals that they knew the old man would never wear. When his allies came under Soviet or domestic pressure, they could look confidently to Washington for firm leadership, and when his enemies tested American resolve, they soon discovered that his resolve was firm and unyielding. Yet his ideas, so clear, were never simplistic. He saw the many sides of truth. Yes, he warned that the Soviet Union had an insatiable drive for military power and territorial expansion, but he also sensed that it was being eaten away by systemic failures impossible to reform. Yes, he did not shrink from denouncing Moscow’s evil empire, but he realized that a man of good will might nonetheless emerge from within its dark corridors. So the president resisted Soviet expansion and pressed down on Soviet weakness at every point until the day came when communism began to collapse beneath the combined weight of those pressures and its own failures. And when a man of good will did emerge from the ruins, President Reagan stepped forward to shake his hand and to offer sincere cooperation. Nothing was more typical of Ronald Reagan than that large-hearted magnanimity, and nothing was more American. Therein lies perhaps the final explanation of his achievements. Ronald Reagan carried the American people with him in his great endeavours because there was perfect sympathy between them. He and they loved America and what it stands for: freedom and opportunity for ordinary people.
Source 1.1: Margaret Thatcher, eulogy for Ronald Reagan, June 11, 2004

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other English Language Assignments

11/21 "A Black Student was Suspended for his Hairstyle..." Rhetorical Analysis2008 AP® English Language and Composition Free-Response Question on Corporate Sponsorship in Schools2008 AP English Language & Composition Rhetorical Analysis Prompt2009 Q3 Adversity2010 Q3 Humor2011B Q3 Freedom and Safety2013 Monument Synthesis2014 Q3 Creativity2015 AP Lang & Comp Rhetorical Analysis2017 Synthesis Essay - The Potential Role of Libraries in Our Future2018 AP Language Argument Prompt2019 Argument Essay2019 Rhetorical Analysis2019 Rhetorical Analysis2019 Synthesis Essay2019 Synthesis Essay2022 AP Language Synthesis: STEM Education Initiatives2022 AP Synthsis: The Value of STEM Education Initiatives2022 Rhetorical Analysis: Sonia Sotomayor 2023 AP Lang Argument2023 Favorite Memories2024 ARG Kingston2. Is Taylor Swift Overrated? An Analysis of Her Impact and CriticismAbigail Adams letter analysisAbsent Students Only: Analyzing Krakauer's Perspective on Chris McCandlessAI Technologies"America Needs Its Nerds" AP Lang RA (2008)Analysis 2.0 of Paul Bogard's Argument on Preserving Natural DarknessAnalysis of Lahiri's Argument on Food, Traditions, and CultureAnalysis of Li Bai's 'Quiet Night Thought'Analysis of Madeleine Albright's Commencement SpeechAnalytical EssayAnalyzing Krakauer's Perspective on Chris McCandlessAnalyzing Rhetorical Choices in Rice's Advocacy for Economic FreedomAnalyzing Rhetorical Strategies in Clare Boothe Luce's SpeechAnalyzing the Rhetoric of Economic ForecastsAnimal Farm Choice #5Animal Farm Essay #2Animal Farm Essay #3Animal Farm Essay #6Animal Farm Essay Choice #1Animal Farm Essay choice #4Animal Farm Literary AnalysisAnnotated Bibliography AssignmentAOW "How Many Transgendered and Intersex People Live in the US?"AP Argument Essay (Overrated Prompt)AP English Lang 2005 FRQ #2 - SatireAP English Language and Composition: Sports Synthesis PromptAP English Language: Divergent Comprehension and AnalysisAP English Language FRQ #3 (Argument) - Purpose of Education