AP Success - AP English Language: San Franciso Earthquake
The passage below is an excerpt from a 20th-century book. (J.M. Scanland, "On the Roofs of the Latin Quarter," Overland Monthly, 57:330. March, 1911.)
Both the city and the Italian Colony were progressing steadily when the 1906 earthquake and fire struck. San Francisco had been razed by fires six times from 1849 to 1851, and each time the ruins had been swept away and the city rebuilt in a much finer fashion. This time, however, the damage was far too extensive. The tragedy was compounded by the great number of people and buildings which were concentrated along the path of the fault.
The destruction caused by the earthquake and the ensuing fire in the Italian Quarter resulted in the complete loss of the district. The Italian Quarter, as other parts of the city hit by the disaster, had been reduced to a knotted, tangled mass of bent steel frames, charred bricks, and ashes. In North Beach, only a small part of the community remained. The Italians on Telegraph Hill had been luckier than most, although they suffered losses since insurance companies were not interested in insuring remote areas of the Hill. The scattered fire hydrants and water cisterns were not to be found east of Dupont Street and the insurance companies were not willing to gamble. It was reported in the Italian press that some 20,000 Italians lost their homes in the conflagration.
One of the priests from the church of Sts. Peter and Paul had managed to save the consecrated host, vestments, and holy vessels and said Mass under the inflamed sky. After the fires had died, the Italians' quietly returned to North Beach and tried to find the confidence to rebuild Little Italy.
Approximately five to six hundred Italians had definitely left San Francisco due to this tragic event, while over six thousand new immigrants arrived and helped the survivors clear the ruins. Seven hundred building permits were granted to North Beach Italian residents and businessmen to expedite the construction of the Colony. Several real estate firms, such as the J. Cuneo Company in North Beach, demonstrated their confidence in the determination of the Italians by investing $400,000 in the reconstruction of apartments, stores, flats, and business offices.
Temporary buildings were cheaply erected for immediate occupancy, while the leaders of the Colony were busily engaged in drawing up plans for a modern Little Italy. The buildings would be simple, small, neat, and airy, which combined both functional and classical lines. One writer described this new architecture as a reflection of the Italian immigrants' acceptance of American ways. The most picturesque features of the flats and apartments were the roof-top sun decks with flower gardens. Part of the planning for the new Colony included the renaming of two of the main thoroughfares of the Italian Quarter. In 1907, one-half of Dupont Street was renamed Grant Avenue, and by the end of 1908 all of Dupont became Grant Avenue. By 1910, Montgomery Avenue was renamed Columbus Avenue and still retained its fame as "The Avenue." The changes in these street names denoted a change in the geographic character of the Italian Quarter.
"La Infernale Catastrofe de San Francisco," L'Italia, p. 1. April 1906.
"The Frightful Calamity on the Pacific Coast," Leslie's Weekly, 102:418. May 3, 1906.
"La Ricostruzione de San Francisco," La Voce del Popolo, p. 1, May 28, 1906.
"Facts and Figures Worthy of Consideration," L'Italia, p. 1. April 12, 1906.
"J. Cuneo Co." L'Italia, July 2, 1906. In deposit, Bank of America NT&SA Archives, San Francisco.
"Curious Tour of City Leaves Telegraph Hill for Fisherman's Wharf," San Francisco Chronicle, p. 12. Feb. 16, 1932.
Peixotto, Scribner's, 48:82. July, 1910.
Question 1
According to the passage, the city of San Francisco was rebuilt several times after fires between 1849 and 18The author suggests that these rebuilds were:
Limited in scope due to financial constraints
Led by the Italian community specifically
Unsuccessful in preventing future disasters
Hindered by the geographic location of the city
Done in a manner that improved the city each time
Question 2
The passage implies that the 1906 earthquake and fire were particularly devastating because:
Previous fires had already weakened the city's structures
The density of population and buildings exacerbated the damage
The city's infrastructure was outdated
The government response was inadequate
There was a lack of preparedness among the residents
Question 3
The term "knotted, tangled mass" (line 13-14) is used to describe the aftermath in the Italian Quarter. This choice of words primarily serves to:
Illustrate the extensive damage in vivid detail
Compare the destruction to previous fires in San Francisco
Indicate the confusion and chaos during the disaster
Highlight the resilience of the Italian community
Suggest the difficulty of the rebuilding process
Question 4
The insurance companies' reluctance to insure areas on Telegraph Hill (lines 17-21) suggests that:
The infrastructure in these areas was particularly vulnerable
They prioritized areas with higher economic value
They were discriminating against certain neighborhoods
The cost of insurance was prohibitively high for residents
They had accurate predictions about the earthquake risks
Question 5
The reference to the priest from the church of Sts. Peter and Paul (lines 25-30) is most likely included to illustrate:
The destruction of religious landmarks in the earthquake
The personal bravery of individuals during crises
The prioritization of spiritual over material recovery
The role of religion in community recovery
The continuity of community rituals despite disaster
Question 6
The influx of new immigrants after the earthquake (lines 32-34) implies that:
San Francisco's population was declining prior to their arrival
There was a significant loss of life among the existing residents
The recovery efforts were dependent on external assistance
The disaster was seen as an opportunity for new beginnings
The Italian community was particularly welcoming to newcomers
Question 7
The granting of building permits to Italian residents and businessmen (lines 35-41) indicates that:
There was a formal process for rebuilding the community
Real estate investments were seen as crucial to recovery
The government was quick to support the affected population
The community prioritized commercial over residential rebuilding
Italians played a significant role in the economic recovery
Question 8
The renaming of streets (lines 53-59) symbolizes:
The commemoration of individuals significant to the recovery
The influence of American culture on the Italian Quarter
The beginning of a new chapter in the community's history
The return to normalcy after the rebuilding efforts
The desire to erase memories of the disaster
Question 9
The overall tone of the passage suggests that the author views the rebuilding of San Francisco's Italian Colony as:
A testament to the resilience and determination of the community
A quick and efficient recovery facilitated by governmental support
A series of misguided efforts that failed to address underlying issues
An inadequate response to a profound community tragedy
A process heavily influenced by external economic interests
Question 10
Based on the passage, the impact of the 1906 disaster on the Italian Colony was:
Marked by a swift and successful rebuilding effort
Comparable in scale to previous disasters in San Francisco's history
Less severe than in other parts of the city due to geographical advantages
Mitigated by the proactive measures taken by the Italian community
Exacerbated by socio-economic factors specific to the Italian Quarter
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.