ACT Success - Science - Practice #2

There are several passages in this test. Each passage is followed by several questions. After reading a passage, choose the best answer to each question. You may refer to the passages as often as necessary. You are NOT permitted to use a calculator on this test.

Group 1

Based on the graph showing how α varies with relative humidity in air at a particular temperature:

Question 1a

Multiple choice

According to the graph, the attenuation coefficient for a 200 Hz sound wave is closest to which value at 30% relative humidity?

  • 3 dB/km

  • 6 dB/km

  • 9 dB/km

  • 12 dB/km

Question 1b

Multiple choice

At what relative humidity does the 500 Hz sound wave show the highest attenuation coefficient according to the graph?

  • 10%

  • 20%

  • 30%

  • 40%

Question 1c

Multiple choice

If the relative humidity increased to 50%, the attenuation coefficient for the 1,000 Hz frequency would most likely be:

  • Less than 5 dB/km

  • Between 5 and 10 dB/km

  • Between 10 and 15 dB/km

  • More than 15 dB/km

Question 1d

Multiple choice

According to the graph, which frequency shows the least variation in attenuation coefficient as relative humidity changes from 10% to 50%?

  • 200 Hz

  • 500 Hz

  • 1,000 Hz

  • All frequencies show similar variation

Group 2

The Mystery of Lightning-Triggered Wildfires

In recent years, scientists have observed a significant increase in wildfires sparked by lightning strikes. While it's well-understood that lightning can ignite dry vegetation, the precise conditions that make certain strikes trigger fires while others do not remain uncertain. Three scientists propose differing viewpoints on the mechanisms behind lightning-triggered wildfires. Scientist 1 According to Scientist 1, the primary factor in whether a lightning strike leads to wildfire ignition is the duration of the lightning strike itself. In dry environments, “long-lasting” or “positive” lightning strikes, which can last up to ten times longer than typical strikes, are much more likely to ignite vegetation. These prolonged strikes heat organic material intensely enough to start a fire, even without immediate rainfall to douse the flames. The persistence of these strikes allows heat to penetrate deeper into the ground or foliage, creating small embers that can smolder and eventually ignite a fire when conditions become drier or winds increase. Positive lightning strikes, according to Scientist 1, are especially dangerous as they often occur in isolated thunderstorms, where dry vegetation is highly exposed to lightning and less likely to be dampened by rain. Scientist 2 Scientist 2 disagrees with the idea that the duration of the lightning strike plays a significant role. Instead, they argue that atmospheric conditions, particularly those associated with dry thunderstorms, determine whether lightning triggers a fire. Dry thunderstorms, where rainfall evaporates before reaching the ground due to low humidity, are frequent in fire-prone areas. Under these conditions, lightning strikes encounter no rain to inhibit the fire-starting process, allowing embers to spread quickly in parched vegetation. The intensity of the storm and the lack of rainfall at ground level are critical to this scientist's theory; without sufficient precipitation, the lightning ignites fuel-rich, dry areas, enabling fires to grow swiftly. According to Scientist 2, this dry thunderstorm phenomenon explains why lightning strikes cause more wildfires in arid regions during certain times of the year. Scientist 3 Scientist 3 presents a more complex theory that centers on the role of vegetation chemistry and soil composition in the fire-starting process. This scientist suggests that lightning strikes are more likely to cause wildfires in areas with vegetation rich in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and soil rich in minerals that can retain heat. Vegetation with high VOC levels, such as certain types of shrubs and pine trees, are more flammable and more likely to ignite when exposed to lightning. In addition, soil in some regions contains high levels of iron and other minerals, which can retain heat from a lightning strike for longer periods, potentially sparking fires days after the initial strike. Scientist 3 believes that these areas, where vegetation and soil composition align, become hotspots for lightning-triggered fires even under conditions where rain may be present, as the combined effect of flammable vegetation and heat-retaining soil increases the probability of ignition.

Class Companion

Question 2a

Multiple choice

Which scientist would likely emphasize the importance of soil minerals in assessing wildfire risks?

  • Scientist 1

  • Scientist 2

  • Scientist 3

  • None of the scientists

Question 2b

Multiple choice

According to Scientist 2, the presence of rain during a thunderstorm:

  • Increases the likelihood of wildfires

  • Has no effect on wildfire occurrence

  • Reduces the likelihood of wildfires

  • Is not mentioned as a factor

Question 2c

Multiple choice

Scientist 1 would likely agree that:

  • Positive lightning strikes are less significant in causing wildfires

  • The chemistry of vegetation does not affect wildfire risks

  • Long-lasting lightning strikes increase wildfire risks

  • Dry thunderstorms decrease wildfire risks

Question 2d

Multiple choice

If an area had low VOC levels in vegetation and high humidity, which scientist's theory would predict the lowest risk of wildfire ignition?

  • Scientist 1

  • Scientist 2

  • Scientist 3

  • Both Scientist 1 and Scientist 3

Question 3a

Multiple choice

Suppose an area experiences a sudden increase in vegetation rich in VOCs. According to the theories presented, this change would most affect the predictions of:

  • Scientist 1

  • Scientist 2

  • Scientist 3

  • Both Scientist 2 and Scientist 3

Question 3b

Multiple choice

If new data showed that positive lightning strikes have the same duration as typical strikes, this would most challenge the explanation of:

  • Scientist 1

  • Scientist 2

  • Scientist 3

  • Both Scientist 1 and Scientist 2

Question 4a

Multiple choice

A team of scientists is studying the effect of salinity on fish respiration. They observe that as the salinity of the water increases from 0% to 3%, the rate of fish respiration increases. However, when salinity increases beyond 3%, the respiration rate begins to decrease sharply. Which of the following conclusions is most consistent with the scientists' observations?

  • Fish are unable to survive in salinities greater than 3%.

  • Fish respiration is directly proportional to salinity in all conditions.

  • Salinity levels above 3% create stress for fish, causing a decline in respiration rate.

  • Fish have an optimal salinity range, beyond which respiration decreases due to osmoregulatory stress.

Question 4b

Multiple choice

A researcher is studying the effect of water temperature on dissolved oxygen levels in a lake. She observes that as water temperature increases from 10°C to 25°C, the dissolved oxygen level decreases. At 10°C, the lake has 12 mg/L of dissolved oxygen, while at 25°C, it has 8 mg/L. However, when the temperature is raised to 30°C, the dissolved oxygen level drops sharply to 5 mg/L. Based on these observations, which of the following conclusions is most likely correct?

  • Dissolved oxygen levels are unaffected by changes in water temperature.

  • Dissolved oxygen levels decrease linearly as water temperature increases.

  • Higher water temperatures reduce dissolved oxygen because warmer water holds less gas.

  • Higher temperatures lead to an increase in dissolved oxygen due to enhanced molecular movement.

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other AP English Assignments